The Truth According To Wikipedia
The Truth according to Wikipedia More info on http://www.vpro.nl/programma/t... (Dutch)Google or Wikipedia? Those of us who search online -- and who doesn't? -- are getting referred more and more to Wikipedia. For the past two years, this free online "encyclopedia of the people" has been topping the lists of the world's most popular websites. But do we really know what we're using? Backlight plunges into the story behind Wikipedia and explores the wonderful world of Web 2.0. Is it a revolution, or pure hype?Director IJsbrand van Veelen goes looking for the truth behind Wikipedia. Only five people are employed by the company, and all its activities are financed by donations and subsidies. The online encyclopedia that everyone can contribute to and revise is now even bigger than the illustrious Encyclopedia Britannica.Does this spell the end for traditional institutions of knowledge such as Britannica? And should we applaud this development as progress or mourn it as a loss? How reliable is Wikipedia? Do "the people" really hold the lease on wisdom? And since when do we believe that information should be free for all?In this film, "Wikipedians," the folks who spend their days writing and editing articles, explain how the online encyclopedia works. In addition, the parties involved discuss Wikipedia's ethics and quality of content. It quickly becomes clear that there are camps of both believers and critics.Wiki's Truth introduces us to the main players in the debate: Jimmy Wales (founder and head Wikipedian), Larry Sanger (co-founder of Wikipedia, now head of Wiki spin-off Citizendium), Andrew Keen (author of The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy), Phoebe Ayers (a Wikipedian in California), Ndesanjo Macha (Swahili Wikipedia, digital activist), Tim O'Reilly (CEO of O'Reilly Media, the "inventor" of Web 2.0), Charles Leadbeater (philosopher and author of We Think, about crowdsourcing), and Robert McHenry (former editor-in-chief of Encyclopedia Britannica). Opening is a video by Chris Pirillo.The questions surrounding Wikipedia lead to a bigger discussion of Web 2.0, a phenomenon in which the user determines the content. Examples include YouTube, MySpace, Facebook, and Wikipedia. These sites would appear to provide new freedom and opportunities for undiscovered talent and unheard voices, but just where does the boundary lie between expert and amateur? Who will survive according to the laws of this new "digital Darwinism"? Are equality and truth really reconcilable ideals? And most importantly, has the Internet brought us wisdom and truth, or is it high time for a cultural counterrevolution?Broadcast date: April 7, 2008Direction: IJsbrand van VeelenInterviews: IJsbrand van Veelen / Marijntje Denters / Martijn KieftResearch: William de Bruijn / Marijntje DentersProduction: Judith van den BergCommissioning editors: Jos de Putter / Doke Romeijn
Canal: Science & Technology
Añadido: December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm
Autor: VPROinternational
Duración: 48:12
Puntuación: 4.37
Reproducciones: 77631
Etiquetas: 2.0 amateur cult encyclopedia expert internet keen knowledge leadbeater macha o'reilly sanger truth wales web wikipedia
Comentarios
|
EUROBAS (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Meanings for the word truth extend from honesty, good faith, and sincerity in general, to agreement with fact or reality in particular. FTW
MusicianMeTube (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
33:28. "Knowledge" is justified true belief.
Justinefhotty14 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
.1 on 1 Sensual Entertainment.dateherwow (dot) com
Krystal8teen55 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Looking for someone to treat a firsttimer right?dateherwow(.)com_
lbrtdy (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
haha Chris's voice is off. Btw he says give credit.
Dodec84 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Not everyone is too lazy to just sit and watch documentaries.
YemeniAref (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
agreed!
korvalt (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Wikipedia is not usually inaccurate, if your looking for historical information. In my experience, it has lied rarely. At the very least, it can give you a rough idea of what your looking for, and where they got information.
hegemonies (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
wikipedia is just another jew censorship slavery tool. First off they let racist zionists have the last word on history of other races expeically blacks. THen they are enslaving people by jumping rank on entertainers and businesses. Now they are about to roll out google ads on the site making money off millions of people and businesses. this is wrong
napajedla (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
never trust wiki about politics ,expecially in the middle east and Israel .wiki is good in non political stuff.
|